Posted: | January 15, 2014 01:46 PM |
---|---|
From: | Representative Brandon P. Neuman |
To: | All House members |
Subject: | Co-sponsorship: Realty Transfer Tax Decision: Miller v. Commonwealth |
In the near future, I will be introducing legislation regarding a critical component of estate planning. The measure would spell out the legal requirements for a living trust to serve as a substitute for a will and help families to continue to transfer property without having to pay the one percent realty transfer tax. The bill would provide definitions for a living trust and provide in statute that a living trust need not be revocable for it to be considered similar to a will for tax purposes. People have been setting up living trusts under the assumption that the one percent realty transfer tax would not apply, as in a traditional will. A recent Pennsylvania legal case targeted the tax liability in a living trust when the Department of Revenue sought taxes, interest and fees after a couple transferred the family home and farm to a Family Irrevocable Trust that named only themselves and their daughter as beneficiaries. The Commonwealth Court upheld the family’s exemption from the Realty Transfer Tax, affirming that the trust was a viable “will substitute.” However, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently overturned that decision, leaving many seniors who had used the prior decision as a basis for estate planning in a precarious situation. By clarifying tax exemptions offered through living trusts, my bill would simplify the estate process by providing a clear understanding of what is legally required to exempt property transfers from taxes. Please join me in sponsoring this important legislation. |
Introduced as HB2031